Shocking.
or am I just being harsh?
Just read an article about how President Obama's daughters are excited at the thought of going to Russia with him on a diplomatic trip. The article was sweet, but the comments after were staggering pieces of evidences that there are idiotic people out there.
I don't have much to say about how appropriate it was to take his daughters and wife along with him- I would just assume that since he is Mr. President 24/7 and he obviously works 'overtime', (although that is understated) shouldn't a man have some quality time with his family? Especially when it isn't breaking any laws to do so. Some people compare this issue with Palin's- but for effing sake- she is NO President! And whilst she puts on her reading glasses to appear more intelligent, she certainly didn't read nor understand rules and regulations when she expensed her "usual expense claims" for her clothes, children, husband and most of all- herself. President Obama had the right to do so and any person in the right frame of mind would do so if this were the case. Blame the policy, not the man. Blame yourself for not arguing against that eons ago when every president did so too. Losers.
Besides, you see those CEOs / Board of directors earning millions because you contributed to their empire through satiating your wants and purchases? THEY earn a lot more money than Mr.President here and still get the perks. Managing some 1 billion or less net worth of a company warrants such a high salary already, I would imagine the immense task of the President of the USA should warrant a 50 million a year salary or more! But it isn't the case, so the perks shouldn't even be talked about. Period. It only shows your ignorance when you debate about such small and petty issues.
I do however, have much to say about Palin's presidency and the republican party. That woman is NOT president material. I was a little shocked in finding out from an American girlfriend of mine who's republican that she voted republican in the last election. My friend's smart and I highly respect her. But in all I could not bring myself to agree that this is the best thing she could have done. I asked her why and she told me that she's republican and that is not going to change, and so she didn't think much about it when she voted (she admitted after I challenged her statement that the republicans spend less and tax less than democrats on everything and that is to the nation's interest). I couldn't see her point also that the US economy is in this state right now because of what Bill Clinton did that made the economy look so bad in Bush's time. But I could only understand her point that anyone being in Bush's shoes might have done the same thing- to go to war. To be fair, I might have. But I am not a politician. Politicians should have more foresight and insight than to follow the sentiments and make a popular decision that he knew couldn't be backed up with hard facts. About Palin- she said that the republican party found a scape goat in her when they lost- so she's really not to blame.
My points:
1. Palin's not very smart. She cannot be a politican. Think about all the awkward moments she had with journalists when she couldn't answer simple questions like experience with foreign relations and a newspaper she subscribes to to read about the US and world's affairs.
Think about how she took 7 years to complete a 3 year course to obviously concentrate on things she felt were more important - pageants?!?
My friend debated that she had friends who did that too in school etc. I said yeah but they weren't politicians were they? Politicians should be the very best the country can offer and I don't beat around the bush when I say I expect them to be at least visibly competent when you ignore the academics. Palin's not.
Also about being the scapegoat, well to be brutally honest if she had been more intelligent or at least appeared to be so, no one was going to fault her for losing the election.
2. How does managing 7000 people in a small community of Alaska compare to managing 200 million people in the USA and 6 billion around the world? You're looking for the leader of the free world, not the leader of a number only large enough to compare it to that of a mid sized MNC.
3. Republicans do not spend less - spending less on the economy and more of war does not justify 'less spending'! In fact, spending on the economy is an investment for future benefits, spending on war... (well you can argue it's for future benefits) but still... that's a sentiment not shared by everyone.
4. Less Taxes does not justify voting for republicans- you still spend the same about of money but collect less- that just means your future generations are going to suffer for the benefits they did not get!
The rich can afford to pay more out of their pay packages, the poor cannot. Getting the rich to pay more makes sure everyone gets by ok. Of course you can question the way benefits are handed out, but that is another issue to tackle altogether.
5. Bush was enjoying the benefits, not delayed trouble from the democrats' term in office. The economy went haywire from the effects of the war, US was still holding up for the initial stage of war until the weight of it caved the economy in.
6. May the best man win- I see not republicans versus democrats but more of the best person for the job. Race is out of the question, it's intelligence, strong economic acumen, readiness and a quickness in mind to get to the solution as soon as possible that should have been key factors in voting.
7. If it were out of religious sentiments that people vote for the republicans, that people were voting for laws against abortion etc. That sounds logical. But with that you're voting for guns ownership and an innate sense of fear and need for protection that came along with it (against who I might add? against everyone else not like themselves!).
8. Lastly, an asian voting republican is quite ironic because of the extreme republican politicians with the exception fo others now seem to be white supremists. If they'll attack the blacks now, they'll attack anyone too but their own.
